Do people actually buy this crap?

21 08 2008

On my flight up to Portland I decided that this is my favorite item from the current issue of Skymall.

Yes, this Pet Observation Dome is perfect if you want to “satisfy a pet’s natural curiosity while maintaining safety and security.”  ….really?

Then earlier today I saw this item at a books store in Portland.

They are cups with pictures of noese on the side of them.  When you drink from the cup it looks like you have a different nose.  Great for CIA operatives, undercover police, and parties where you are trying to avoid someone…





TV shows coming back!

20 08 2008

I have been pretty upset with some of the Olympic coverage on NBC, but one great thing I have learned from all this TV watching is that some awesome shows are coming back on NBC.  Everyone watches The Office and some people watch 30 Rock, but few people have heard of Chuck or Life.  Both Chuck and Life are really good shows, with the best part being that each is only on season 2. Plenty of time to catch up for those who have not watched them yet!





MIT Volleyball is actually good at school!

13 08 2008

When I talk to people about sports at MIT people always ask if the teams are good, but no one ever asks if the students do well in school. I guess its usually taken for granted that MIT student athletes get good grades, and for the second year in a row both the MIT men’s and women’s volleyball teams proved this true by qualifying for the AVCA all academic teams. This is especially awesome because Vassar was the only other college in the entire country to have both programs make it. For men, the only other schools were Vassar and Stanford. Not bad company.

MIT article





Underage olympians?

13 08 2008

I’ve been watching a TON of Olympics lately (upwards of 5 hours a day), but surprisingly this is my first post on the event….

What got me thinking today was that some Chinese gymnast have been under suspicion for possibly not meeting the minimum age requirements for competing in Olympic gymnastics.  Two quick thoughts on this…

  • Why do sports have different age requirements?  In gymnastics its 16, but in other sports kids are competing way before that age.  It could be that gymnastics is physically more demanding so kids should be older, but weather or not these girls are in the Olympics they are still training the same way.  I keep hearing over and over that Chinese girls are picked at the age of 3 to start training so it seems rather arbitrary to me that a 15 year old can’t go while a 16 with “official Chinese documents” is allowed to.  Maybe there is a good reason for the age rule, but these girls are under immense pressure since age 3 so it doesn’t seem to matter that much.
  • At first it seemed really unjust that these Chinese girls that look 12 were beating Americans who obviously meet the minimum age requirement, but the more I thought about the situation the less it seemed to matter.  Sure the Chinese might be underage, but after watching them compete even I have to admit that they were the better gymnasts.  Does a America have a legion of 14 year old gymnasts that are better than the 16 year olds we sent to Beijing?  If so then its unfortunate for the Americans, but more likely the US sent its 5 best gymnasts and still lost to China.

It’s like a reverse Danny Almonte situation…. Somehow possibly younger kids beating older ones just doesn’t seem quite as wrong.

Then again this guy is 20???





39<86<100

9 08 2008


Today my dad and I went on a bike ride out to Ventura and back on a ride that was supposed to be 100 miles round trip. The most I had ever previously done was 39 miles, so 100 was going to be quite the step up. Everything was going well on the way out, but on the way back my knee started to hurt pretty badly. I wanted to keep going but ended up having to stop at mile 86. It wasnt the 100 miles I was looking for, but still a lot more than 39… can’t complain.





Colbert Report

8 08 2008

This was one of the funniest things I have seen on TV in a while.  From the Colbert Report last night…


“Not only has [Michael Phelps] broken 26 world records and won 6 olympic gold medals, he has also somehow found time to play Jim on the office and lead the Giants to a Super Bowl victory”





Cowboys training camp

8 08 2008

Today I had a pretty fun time going to the Cowboys training camp. I saw TO, Romo, packman and all the other members of “America’s Team,” and the only thing that could have made the afternoon more enjoyable is if I actually liked the Cowboys. I guess they aren’t that bad, but when I was younger I really didn’t like them. The reason is that I grew up a 49ers fan (my dad grew up in San Francisco and LA has no football team), so naturally I couldn’t like them.

The most interesting thing that came out of the afternoon is that I gained some respect for TO. I like watching him play because he truly is a great receiver, but off the field I think he is childish and self absorbed. Yet today I saw first hand what he has to deal with all the time. Fans just kept yelling his name and taunting him the entire practice. Surely he invites some of this because he calls so much attention to himself (remember the sit up workout?), but in person today it even seemed like too much. There was even a guy dressed up in a Santa outfit with a giant bucket of popcorn (referring to a press conference earlier this year with TO and Jerry Jone)…too bad I didn’t get a picture.





The percieved value of “FREE”

4 08 2008

I have this crazy theory that people love free stuff.  The only problem is that stuff isn’t “free” often enough.

Take for example any regular US plane flight.  Normally if you fly coach the airline charges you a $5 fee for a bottle of beer, where as soda and juice are free.  Since this is the cultural norm people don’t think to much of it.  Yet when airlines do give you something free (drinks in this case) people always seem to comment on how AWESOME it is to get something “free”.

One flight which does give these free drinks is the Delta shuttle from Boston to NY.  On this flight every passenger of the appropriate age is offered free beer in addition to the regular options of juice or soda.  This flight may be a little unusual that it caters to a heavily business focused crowd (where it should be noted that individuals often have a company paying for their flights), but none the less drinks are still “free.”  When I say “free” in this case its I mean that the airline must just be passing the extra cost of these drinks directly on to the consumer in the ticket price.  But is that really such a bad thing?  I love the fact that Delta offers this free drinks service because it differentiates this flight from most other cost cutting routes.

Thinking back to a marketing class I took last semester I remember a discussion on consumers relative price elasticity.  The lecture focused on a behavioral economics idea that people have an irrational focus on relative levels of pricing when a truly rational person would only be concerned with absolute price.  Take for example the difference in purchasing a soda and a car.  These may seem like completely different purchases but stick with me for a minute.  If we say that normally a soda costs $1 and a car costs $20,000 we can see there is a huge difference in price.  Now lets say the price for a soda is $10 and the price of a care is $20,0009.  Very few people people would be willing to pay $10 for a soda (a $9 price difference) where as the same absolute price change in an expensive car means little to the consumer.  In either case the consumer is deciding whether to spend an additional $9, but since the soda represents a 1000% increase in price the consumer is not willing to spend the extra money.

This directly relates back to the earlier airline beer example.  I always say no to the $5 airline drink, but would be much more willing to pay $5 more on the price of a $300 plane ticket to get this kind of perk.  It’s the same $5 either way, but relative to the cost of a plane ticket, $5 doesn’t seem like that much money.  Which is a perfect example of me thinking irrationally!

Including “free” stuff in the price of a ticket already happens in first class.  The first class overpriced tickets come with cookies, warm towelettes, drinks and many other amenities, but the problem is that for most people the price of a first class ticket far exceeds their budgets.  And then why is there a first class?  It’s a way for the airlines to segment the market.  It’s away to figure out who is price sensitive and which travelers can afford high class service at any price.  It’s the same reason that people on airlines pay different prices depending on where they sit, when they book, or how they travel.  So then the original idea of stuff for “free” gets a little more complicated because charging for extras is just another way to segment the flying market.  It is the airlines way of figuring out which person says, “I want the cheapest flight with no frills,” verse the individual who wants a cheep ticket then decides that they are on vacation so “what the heck, I’ll take that 5 dollar beer.” 

So then if you can’t ask people if they want to pay additional money for a beer then how do you figure out who will pay extra?  The answer….don’t worry about it!

It appears that drinks for purchase should do a perfect job of signaling which individuals would be willing to pay the extra $5 for a drink.  Yet we already know that people are not totally rational when it comes to relative prices.  It’s likely that people would have a more enjoyable flying experience if the nominal additional charge was included in the bill for this extra amenities.  A bottle of beer costs like $1 to buy in bulk where as a soda is like $0.25.  Since a beer and soda probably have very similar handling costs once the product is purchased, it seems completely reasonable to charge me $2 more on a ticket to make me think “Wow, this airline just gave me a ‘free’ beer, where as most other airlines charge $5…I really like this airline!”

The last thing (I know this post somehow got way long) that comes to mind on the topic is that so far I’ve only been discussing the specific example of alcoholic drinks on a plane, but this line of thinking could be applied to so many other areas of business.  Sticking with the plane example, maybe the airlines could do something where passengers are charged an additional $2 on the ticket and airlines provide warm cookies to those passengers which do not want to drink.  This should make people think that they are getting “free” stuff and works to not unfairly overcharge individuals who can’t/don’t take advantage of, in this example, the provided drinks. Or instead look at business which provide employees with food or drinks throughout the work day.  I have friends working at companies that provide “free” dinner if you work late, and I have also personally worked at two companies which had fully stocked kitchens for employees to enjoy during the day.  Instead of only offering coffee and water, these companies provide an extra service which employees covet.  Obviously the money is coming from what could be sightly higher profits at the end of the year, but if your company is doing 1 billion in revenue wouldn’t you rather spend 20 thousand dollars a year on happy employees who actually like coming to work?  Its a trade off, but in many cases I think companies focus too much on cutting costs without realizing what small “free” things can do for moral or reputation.

I DON’T want companies to go overcharging me for tons of extra things, but there are many situations where they can give me something “free” and I will love it…probably without even realizing that I am paying for it.